Model 1: Continuous and face-to-face evaluation
The evaluation will consist of two parts:
|
1.
|
Student portfolio: it will have a weight of 40% in the final grade, which will be obtained from the mathematical average of the two parts that constitute it
|
|
|
a. Individual activity: It will consist of a brief research or innovation proposal, reasoned and justified,theoretically supported by at least two articles or book chapters
|
|
|
b. Journal of sessions: It will consist of a brief summary of the activities carried out during the sessions and a reflection on the general content of the subject.
|
|
| |
|
|
2. Design and presentation of a research or innovation project in the teaching of Language and Literature (60%)
It is to design a small research or innovative educational intervention in a specific subject of the specialty of Language and Literature, for the context of the classroom where the internship is carried out. In both cases, the extension will be 10-15 pages (not including bibliography and annexes), following the APA norms that appear in Moodle. The exposition can be made in class or telematically.
Evaluation criteria for written work (45%): Coherent articulation of the analysis of the various sections of the project; assessment of the coherence between the purposes of the project and the results obtained; assessment of the adequacy to the diversity of the students; quality of the documentation, indicating the sources used; spelling and presentation.
Evaluation criteria for the presentation (15%): Justification and argumentation of the analysis carried out; use of the communication skills: adequacy, clarity, originality and rhythm in the presentation; relevance and originality of the resources used. Enthusiasm and conviction of the ideas presented; attention to the established time.
Model 2: overall test and second call
It will be written and will be carried out individually. It will consist of two parts:
|
1.
|
Design of a research or innovation project in the teaching of Language and Literature, according to the standards set out in the continuous evaluation model (60%).
|
|
2.
|
Written test on the content of the subject (40%). This will consist of the design of a practice related to the contents of the subject included in the final section of training activities and the development of a topic of those included in the program of the subject.
|
In both the continuous evaluation and the global evaluation, the minimum grade of 5 must be obtained in order to be able to average with the rest of the parts.
Fifth and sixth call: In the same terms as the global test described above.
Finally, it must be taken into account that the Regulations of the Norms of Coexistence of the University of Zaragoza will be applicable to the irregularities committed in the evaluation tests by means of academic fraud, as well as the application of article 30 of the Regulations of the Norms of Evaluation of Learning in relation to irregular practices other than academic fraud.